EWWW Image Optimizer vs W3 Total Cache
Side-by-side security comparison powered by WP HealthKit's 46-layer automated audit.
EWWW Image Optimizer
Cv8.5.0
W3 Total Cache
Dv2.9.4
Score Comparison
| Dimension | EWWW Image Optimizer | W3 Total Cache | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security | B70 | D25 | EWWW Image Optimizer |
| Standards | A90 | A90 | Tie |
| Quality | D25 | D25 | Tie |
| Compatibility | D25 | D25 | Tie |
Stats Comparison
Findings
310
EWWW Image Optimizer
866
W3 Total Cache
Critical Issues
No
EWWW Image Optimizer
Yes
W3 Total Cache
Standards Score
100/100
EWWW Image Optimizer
100/100
W3 Total Cache
Active Installs
1.0M
EWWW Image Optimizer
900K
W3 Total Cache
Frequently Asked Questions
Is EWWW Image Optimizer more secure than W3 Total Cache?
Based on WP HealthKit's automated audit, EWWW Image Optimizer has a stronger security profile with a grade of C compared to D.
Which plugin has better coding standards?
EWWW Image Optimizer has a standards grade of A while W3 Total Cache has A. Both scores are based on WP HealthKit's automated coding standards analysis.
Compare Different Plugins
Choose any two plugins from our directory to see a detailed side-by-side security comparison.
Compare Plugins