Skip to main content
WP HealthKit

Is Static Suffix – Site Wide .html Extension Secure?

A

Grade AExcellent

Low Risk

Static Suffix – Site Wide .html Extension passes WP HealthKit's 49-layer security audit with flying colours, earning a Grade A with only 52 minor findings.

Grade

A

Findings

52

Critical

0

Standards

100/100

Active Installs

N/A

Last Audited

Today

What We Found

22 unprefixed global functions detectedHIGH
Parameter #3 $args of function register_setting expects array{type?: string, label?: string, description?: string, sanitize_callback?: callable(): mixed, show_in_rest?: array|bool, default?: mixed}, 'stse_sanitize_array' given.MEDIUM
Parameter #3 $args of function register_setting expects array{type?: string, label?: string, description?: string, sanitize_callback?: callable(): mixed, show_in_rest?: array|bool, default?: mixed}, 'stse_sanitize_array' given.MEDIUM
Offset 'post_format' on array<int, WP_Taxonomy> in isset() does not exist.MEDIUM
Parameter #1 $text of function esc_html expects string, int given.MEDIUM

+ 47 more findings in the full report.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Static Suffix &#8211; Site Wide .html Extension safe to use?

Static Suffix &#8211; Site Wide .html Extension passes WP HealthKit's 49-layer security audit with flying colours, earning a Grade A with only 52 minor findings.

How many vulnerabilities does Static Suffix &#8211; Site Wide .html Extension have?

WP HealthKit's audit found 52 findings for Static Suffix &#8211; Site Wide .html Extension: 0 critical, 1 high, and 49 medium severity issues.

What is Static Suffix &#8211; Site Wide .html Extension's security grade?

Static Suffix &#8211; Site Wide .html Extension has an overall security grade of A (Excellent) based on WP HealthKit's 49-layer security audit.