Classic Editor vs Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)
Side-by-side security comparison powered by WP HealthKit's 49-layer automated audit.
Classic Editor
Av1.6.7
Score Comparison
| Dimension | Classic Editor | Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Security | A90 | A90 | Tie |
| Standards | A90 | A90 | Tie |
| Quality | A90 | D25 | Classic Editor |
| Compatibility | C50 | D25 | Classic Editor |
Stats Comparison
Findings
26
Classic Editor
226
Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)
Critical Issues
No
Classic Editor
No
Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)
Standards Score
100/100
Classic Editor
100/100
Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)
Active Installs
9.0M
Classic Editor
2.0M
Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Classic Editor more secure than Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®)?
Based on WP HealthKit's automated audit, Classic Editor has a stronger security profile with a grade of A compared to B.
Which plugin has better coding standards?
Classic Editor has a standards grade of A while Advanced Custom Fields (ACF®) has A. Both scores are based on WP HealthKit's automated coding standards analysis.
Compare Different Plugins
Choose any two plugins from our directory to see a detailed side-by-side security comparison.
Compare Plugins